Evening Reading: 5/22/07

Randy Morin is 100% correct.  Those on the outside looking in could easily change the game by linking to each other.  For me, it’s a matter of recreating the blogosphere or leaving it altogether.  Once we get a collective voice, the blogging elite will let us in the club, and we can all blog together.  It’s not about pulling the A-Listers down, it’s about pulling ourselves up.  Scott Kingery agrees.

Google declares Google Office victory.  Maybe, if victory means being used by non-corporate cheapskates.  I don’t know a single person who uses Google Apps in lieu of Office or Works.  Not one.

Karl Martino makes some good points about online news, and expects to be ignored.  See item 1 above.

Darren Rowse, who I consider an un-A-Lister even though he never answered my question, has a good post on growing a blog.

Random blogs I like: Ben Metcalfe, Brad Kellett, Craig Newmark, Greg Hughes, Jeremy Zawodny, Kevin Briody, Ric Hayman, Richard Querin, Steven Streight and Zoli Erdos.

Amazing rumble in the jungle between lions, crocodiles and buffalo.  (via Rob Gale)

Robert Scoble says he’s in a blogging malaise.  That’s sort of like those celebrities who complain about all the fans asking them for autographs and whatnot.  Robert should be thankful for his blogging fame (which he deserves and earned through hard work).  So I’m not going to shed too many tears for him.

Seth makes a good point in the comments to my unblogosphere post.

On that note, I have lately forgotten to implement my new policy, so thanks to Seth, Barbidoll31, Mike, TDavid, Richard, Louis, OmegaMom, EthanSusan, Holly, DeeJay and Kelly for commenting on my recent posts.  Please keep ’em coming!

Technorati tags:

Neither is the Blogosphere

Dave Winer points out that some conferences he recently attended were not unconferences.  He says “people don’t seem ready yet to accept that knowledge is distributed through the room.”

I agree that the structure of an unconference is a better way to learn about a lot of stuff.  But I sort of feel the way Dave felt at those conferences every time I fire up my feed reader.

If we want to promote unconferences, first we need to promote an unblogosphere.

Technorati tags: ,

Partial Feeds + Banner Ads in Each Post = Bye Bye

I’ve noticed that some people are starting to combine partial feeds with a big ad banner at the end of each partial post in said feed.  I will unsubscribe to any feeds that do that.  Bye bye to two long time reads, Blog Herald and PC Doctor.

If this becomes the norm, it will spell the end of my blog reading.

UPDATE: Adrian (the PC Doctor) emailed me and said the banner ads at the end of every feed post was a technical glitch.  I have resubscribed.  Thanks to Adrian for emailing to clear that up.

Technorati tags: ,

YouTube Killer…Arrgg I Say

So The Pirate Bay is going to launch a YouTube Killer.

That’s sort of like a company called “Bank Robbers” launching a Bank of America Killer.  “The Pirate Bay” translated into any language means “Please Sue Me, I Dare You, You Pansy.”

I mean, come on.  I think that’s a hilarious name, and part of me is pulling for them just because I bet they like Monty Python too.  But there’s a little more to slaying YouTube than a waiving a funny name and a middle finger at big media.

Ask Yahoo how they did slaying eBay.

The only way anyone is going to put a material dent in YouTube’s stranglehold on the streaming video market is by putting up a bunch of copyrighted stuff and somehow making it stick.  Granted, The Pirate Bay (arrgg, matey) is at the front of that line, having grown out of the Swedish anti-copyright organization.

But as AllOfMP3.com found out, an offshore address is no panacea for legal troubles.

The Pirate Bay has been on the run from the get go, with allegations that U.S. political pressure forced Swedish police to raid them once already.  I certainly don’t think that’s the highest and best use of U.S. foreign relations, and while I’ve never used The Pirate Bay, I can see why people pull for them.

But popularity is one thing.  YouTube, well that’s something else.

Either way, it should be fun to watch.

Arrgg!

Technorati tags: ,

Googleball: A False Underdog Story

underdogI continue to be amazed at Google’s ability to effectively play the underdog card.  Somehow Google is able to look and quack like Mr. Drysdale and yet get treated like Jed Clampett, pre shooting at some food.

I don’t know if it’s brilliant marketing, Microsoft hate or some combination of the two.  But it seems to be working.

Google has a market cap of $146,000,000,000.00.  That’s $146 billion.  An insane figure for a company that basically has no tangible product to sell.  A company whose revenue stream is closer to media than tech.  A company whose stock price is $470 and whose trailing P/E ratio is above 40.

How does Google pull it off?

Maybe it’s the collective “I can’t believe this is happening to me” effect.

Google went public on August 19, 2004 at $85, via a dutch auction.  I bid 60 something dollars, fully expecting not to get any, but thinking wrongly that anything higher was too much.  Those who bought just 100 shares at $8,500 at the IPO now have stock worth $47,000.  A $25,500 investment is now worth $141,000.  If I had bid higher and gotten a few hundred shares, I probably wouldn’t write anything relating to Google but thank you notes.

Somehow, Google is able to play the little ‘ol me card while simultaneously nipping at the heels of the Fortune 50.  Here are the U.S. companies with a larger market cap than Google: ExxonMobil, GE, Microsoft, Citigroup, AT&T, Bank of America, P&G, Wal-Mart, Pfizer, American International Group, J&J, JP Morgan Chase, Chevron, Berkshire Hathaway, IBM, Cisco and Altria.  Pretty nice company.

Or maybe Google just knows how to throw a pep rally.

Today Donna Bogatin writes about Google’s coach-like fear of the opponent.

Microsoft (DISCLAIMER: I am a Microsoft shareholder) has set its sights on Google’s sacred online ad dollar, buying digital marketing (read advertising) company aQuantive, Inc for $6B.  Plus, Microsoft has lots of money and employees.  And Bill Gates.

Google says it’s worried.  You can almost hear the clanging of locker room chairs as its employees gather round to listen.

“Win one for the Brin-er!”

Meanwhile, in the other locker room, Donna quotes Steve Ballmer, Microsoft’s Gates Lite, talking about how Google puts its pants on one leg at a time:

I don’t really know that anyone has proven that a random collection of people doing their own thing actually creates value.

Maybe not, and Google has certainly had a hard time trying to capture lightning in a bottle the second time.  But Microsoft has products to sell, a ton of cash and application dominance (those who say Office is dead don’t spend much time in corporate offices).

Yet it still trails Google and Yahoo in the race for online dominance.  All that cash and all that structure still hasn’t created decent looking web destinations.  Give Google a computer tariff on virtually every computer sold, and I suspect Google would crush Microsoft and Yahoo.

But the online media game is an away game for Microsoft.

Part of it is that applications and media and online search are different animals.  Dominance in one does not easily translate to the others.  Part of it is scheduling.  While Google and Microsoft dilute their energy by fighting over every possible revenue steam and their bank accounts in the startup rush of ’07, will opportunities arise for a dark horse?  Yahoo perhaps?

I don’t know.  But I do know that playing the underdog role has served Google well.

Even when the lines say it’s not the underdog.

Technorati tags: , ,

Farewell Windows Live OneCare, Hello Kaspersky

My dislike of the once great Norton Antivirus has been well documented.  I have lately been on a quest for a simple, effective, non-intrusive antivirus program that doesn’t slow my computer to a crawl or try to operate it for me.

I don’t need a program to tune up my computer.  I don’t need a hundred pop-up alerts every time I log on.  Unless the black plague is running rampant on my hard drive, I don’t want to see anything related to my antivirus program.

When I ditched Norton, I tried the absurdly named Windows Live OneCare.  At first, I liked it, but that was the Norton effect.  After Norton, anything feels wonderful.  Over time, however, I came to realize that Windows Live OneCare was slowly taking over my computer.  Again, I don’t want a frickin’ computer tune up.  Not now.  Not ever.

So last night, I uninstalled Windows Live OneCare.  And resumed my search for the holy grail of antivirus programs.

Next up is Kaspersky Antivirus 6.0.  I’ve read good things about it.  So let’s install it and see what’s what.

It was easy to purchase.  Paypal payments are accepted, which is a plus for me.  The download file is around 19 megabytes.  Installation took a couple of minutes and seemed crisp and efficient.  By the time it was done, I had received an email with my license key.  Everything was activated and up and running within minutes.  So far, so good.

Time to restart my computer.

I noticed no delay in my boot up.  This is not telling, however, as FileBack PC, a great back up application, takes forever to load (note to FileBack developers- please figure out how to make the program load silently in the background, without stalling the PC).

Kaspersky ran a start up scan, which took a couple of minutes.  It was pretty unintrusive and didn’t stall my PC.  A full scan took 11 hours (I have a lot of files and an external backup drive, so most stuff was scanned twice).  The application ran relatively unobtrusively in the background.  It reported and neutralized several infected emails, mostly trojans, that Windows Live OneCare did not find.  In fairness, that may be because for the past few weeks I have been waging a computer turf war with Windows Live OneCare, hammering the “x” every time it launched an assault against my computer turf.

One thing I like about Kaspersky is that when you tell it to stop, it stops.  No pop-ups or warnings.

It’s too early to tell if Kaspersky is my holy grail.

So far, I’m optimistic.  Time will tell.

Evening Reading: 5/18/07

Dave Wallace has some good ideas for blog promotion.

Tutorial Blog has a list of free Photoshop plugins.  roScripts has some nifty Photoshop resources.

Download Squad on my blogging buddy, Guy Kawasaki‘s Truemors.  Guess what: “[J]ust a few hours after the site went live, it was filled with spam.”  I told you so.

More Moore.  Earl’s son Aaron is blogging with him.  That is very cool.  Here’s Aaron’s post on Unsanity’s Shapeshifter: “Back in the days before I ever thought I would be using a Mac as my only computer, I did everything I could to make Windows something different.”  I’m a Windows guy, but I totally get that.

Am I the only one who is overwhelmed by the number of posts at Engadget?  I can’t help but think a ton of those posts get blown off or skimmed due to the huge volume.

I am depressed by the thought of Google buying Feedburner.

Hugh MacLeod has 15 new blogcard designs available.  Hey Hugh, I’ll pay you $50 out of my promotion budget for a Newsome.Org card.  It doesn’t even have to be flattering.

Kevin Tofel has pictures of the Dell Tablet PC.

Technorati tags:

The Earnest Web

Earnest – a serious and intent mental state.
– Merriam-Webster

I’ve noticed a trend lately when reading my feeds.  There are so many bloggers churning out earnest posts about supposedly earnest products and events that the fun quotient in the blogosphere is really taking a hit.  My feeds look like hundreds of little sleep-inducing Wall Street Journals.

It’s boring.  And ironic.  Ironic, because so many people are spending a ton of time and effort to mimic the very thing they claim to be in the process of replacing.  Infinite potential manifesting itself in the digital equivalent of the neighborhood newspapers we did as kids.

Blogging should be so much more than that.  Why should we albatross this new, improved and dynamic medium by using it in such a provincial manner?  How many “me too” posts do people really need to read about the latest Web 2.0 application?  One might be too many.  Hundreds are far too many.  It’s imitation to the point of irrelevancy.

Many, if not most, bloggers have the potential to be so much more than that.  To be more interesting.  To have more fun.  But fun makes the earnest blogger uncomfortable.  This is serious stuff for him, and he believes that serious and fun just aren’t compatible.  It saddens me to see all this brainpower, potential and effort directed at something so…indistinguishable.

And it doesn’t work.

No moat can contain attention.  It flies across the blogosphere at the speed of broadband.  Clicking here and yon with abandon.  And abandonment- of things too common, or too uninteresting.  Or too earnest.

The toll of earnest writing is heavy.  It’s hard to be serious all the time, particularly when you’re not being paid a decent wage to act that way.  After a while, you just give up, the way we did with our little neighborhood newspapers.  The way so many do with their blogs.

The remedy for this is a healthy dose of fun.  And the realization that fun only has three letters.  Fortunes are made on fun every day.  In fact, when you cut through the jargon, most of the stuff bloggers are concerned with are based on fun.  No one ever confused YouTube with Masterpiece Theatre.

If you want to create a new journalism, you can’t do it in the staid image of the old one.

You have to live outside the box.  Let you hair down.  Write something fun or funny.  Let it all hang out.

Otherwise, you’re just another boring newspaper nobody wants to read.  Fun beats smart every time, and in every way.

Technorati tags: ,

Morning Reading: 5/15/07

John Watson has created some nice “screen time” tickets to teach kids to self-regulate their TV and computer time.  I like this idea a lot.

NicheGeek has 10 Stupid Online Ideas that Made Someone Rich.

Donna Bogatin says that Bill Gates says the Yellow Pages will be gone in 5 years.  I thought they were gone already.

Doc Searls on why he keeps blogging.  “Even if many bloggers are now entertaining hopes of Buck Two or Buck Two Thousand, blogging is still that garage band. And, at its best, it still rocks.”

Amazon bought Digital Photo Review, the best digital photography review site.

Technorati tags:

Blog Promotion: How Do You Do It?

In my Darren Rowse post the other day I asked what people would do if they had $1,000 to promote their blogs.  I have been thinking about budgeting a little money to promote Newsome.Org to potential new readers.

selfpromotion

TDavid responded with a fantastic and detailed post, full of ideas for anyone looking to spend a little money for more traffic.  It is a must read for anyone trying to build a blog.  Even if you don’t plan to spend money promoting your blog, it’s still a must read, as he includes a number of cost-free promotion ideas.

As TDavid points out, I went on a non-scheduled, unannounced blogging hiatus for several months.  I didn’t intend to.  I just got burned out and one week turned into two, etc.  I went through the same sort of thing Scoble talked about the other day.  A confluence of real world responsibilities and what often seems like a low rate of return on the hard work of blogging put me out of the blogging business for a while.  When I started back (also unplanned), I had lost some of my audience and my Technorati ranking was in free fall.

The point is that blogging is a marathon, not a sprint, for most of us.  This is particularly true when you are geographically remote and unable to plug into a local blogging culture.  Steve Gillmor, who I have met in the real world and consider a pal, tells me geography doesn’t matter in the blogosphere.  I respectfully disagree.  It’s not something you can’t overcome, but I believe if I lived in the Bay Area, I’d become friends with a lot of the guys out there, who would in turn include me in more of their online conversations.

But, like a lot of us, I don’t live out there.  So I have to find another way to promote my blog.  TDavid has some great ideas, many based on his personal history of successfully growing both a blog and other web sites.

TDavid says you need at least 75 posts a month to be in growth mode.  Historically, I would have disagreed with that, but I come from an old media perspective, having written for newspapers and trade journals for years (where a coveted monthly column became burdensome to the point of impossibility).  But having been involved in the blogosphere for a few years, I think he’s probably right.  If not for the content itself, for the content and the embedded links to draw other writers to your site, and to seed the reciprocal links which are, for better or worse, one of the established measuring sticks for blog readership.

TDavid gives some stats that support his more posts the better theory.

Then he proposes an allocation of my $1,000.

He breaks it down into 4 areas: design, widgets, contests and advertising.  Go read his post for details.  Now for my thoughts about each.

Design:  I think I should spend a little money on design, and perhaps a better search approach.  I used to use an internal Perl search engine at Newsome.Org, but I switched to Google a couple of years ago.  I think the first thing I need to do is figure out how to move my content to a WordPress platform- as there are a lot of design possibilities in WordPress that don’t exist via Blogger (my site is locally hosted, but I use Blogger (via Live Writer) to publish content).  Eric Scalf kindly wrote a WordPress template of my basic design for me last year, but I didn’t make the switch because of the frustrating URL problem.

If you are a new blogger, start with WordPress, because it’s sometimes hard to switch once you have a large archive.

Widgets: I have experimented with a number of widgets, and have a few on the site now, including my poor excuse for a tag cloud in which “nbsp,” html for a space, is the most popular “tag.”  You’ve got to love that.  Again, I think I could solve a lot of this if I could switch to WordPress.  Some widgets have a material adverse effect on page load times, so you have to be thoughtful about which ones to add.  After ignoring it for a long time, I have become a fan of the MyBlogLog widget, and find a lot of new blogs via the people who visit Newsome.Org.  I also like the Flickr widget, but it drives very little traffic to my Flickr photos.  I’m still using the GoodBlogs widget, but it’s currently under review, simply because I don’t know how much inbound traffic it generates.  I use the Twitter widget mainly to encourage readers to add me to their Twitter lists.

Steven Streight has a good summary of some available Widgets.

Contests: This is one area that I’ve been thinking about for some time.  I will definitely have a contest or two in the near future.  It seems like a good way to reward current readers and hopefully attract some new ones.

Advertising:  I have also thought about doing some advertising.  TDavid suggests Google Adwords.  I may give it a try, but I have no idea how much bang for your buck you’d get from say, a $250 purchase.  I like his idea about doing a post on the experience to get some added value.

TDavid then provides some effective, cost-free ways to promote your blog.

I used to do trackbacks a lot more than I do now.  I need to start doing them more, because they worked.  I think commenting on other blogs is also a way to get in front of potential new readers.  TDavid has several more good ideas.

This I know: no one is going to read your blog just because you write it.  And the be a good soldier, write hard and wait to be discovered technique is too remote to be a good bet.  We all have to do something to attract readers.

What do you do to promote your blog?

I’ll add links to any posts addressing this topic here, so others can read them too.

Technorati tags: ,