It will be interesting to see if the rising number of denunciations and protests over Apple’s banning of Google Voice apps will have any effect. During last night’s podcast, I said I thought Apple was an extremely arrogant company and asked my podcast mates if they could think of an example where Apple reversed a decision due to popular outcry. We couldn’t think of any good examples.
Meanwhile, the protests continue.
Today, Mike Arrington quit the iPhone, expressly as a result of the Google Voice debacle. I applaud Mike for doing that. I don’t often- or even usually- agree with him, so if he and I are on the same side of an issue, we must be right. Stated simply, it’s foolish and unnecessary for Apple to side against its customers and Google. If people are forced to choose between Apple and Google, Apple may be surprised at how many puppies run to the other side of the room.
And there’s more at stake here than meets the eye. While the App Store/Google Voice thing is important on its own, I believe it is a barometer for Apple’s future.
Do the right thing, and everyone falls immediately back in love with all things Apple. Stay the inconsistent and illogical course and this issue could be the beginning of the end of Apple’s golden era. You can’t call yourself a hero and act like a villain. You can’t be the people’s choice if you don’t choose the people.
One interesting subplot to all this: Google wins either way. Think about it.
Harry McCracken believes Apple may come around. I hope he’s right, but I’m not so sure. The price cut Harry mentions was a nice, but isolated gesture. I suspect Apple views the wall it has erected around the App Store as more sacred- and more profitable- than what amounted to a glorified coupon (recall that the credit Apple handed out was good for future, marked up, purchases). To reverse course now on the Google Voice decision- even though it would be the smart and just move- would set the stage for more second guessing of Apple’s erratic app approval/rejection process. And we know that the one thing that Apple loves almost as much as money is control.
The most amazing thing about this whole app approval brouhaha is how easy it could be fixed. All Apple has to do is three simple things:
1. Be at least semi-transparent. Tell people what is going on. In life and business, a little explanation goes a long way.
2. Tell the truth. Don’t speak in riddles or half-truths. Don’t let ATT take the blame if the blame is not theirs and toss them in the grease if it is. And don’t hide behind the duplicate functionality canard. If you simply want to control the experience to the detriment of customers, Google or whomever else, just have the stones to say so.
3. Be consistent. Inconsistency is the great motivator of unrest. Apple has been the model of inconsistency as far as the App Store goes.
That’s how to make it better. But it could also get worse.
Lately we have been seeing more and more signs that Apple is struggling with the jailbreaking thing. First came the warning that jailbreaking could result in terrorism. Now we read an official support article warning folks about the risks they assume by choosing the apps they want to install, rather than letting Apple decide for them. I wonder if the great irony that it is precisely Apple’s iron grip on the app approval process that is driving people to jailbreak their iPhones is lost on Apple?
So for now Apple tries to educate us away from jailbreaking. What’s next, when that doesn’t work? Will Apple start disabling jailbroken iPhones? Or perhaps take a page from the record industry’s book of bad strategy and try to litigate the cat back into the bag?
As you can see, this issue is bigger than just our desire to have Google Voice apps on our iPhones. Apple and its customers have come to a crossroad, and we need to at least try to point Apple toward the right path. We need to continue to express our concerns, displeasure, questions, etc.
We have looked out for Apple, now Apple needs to look out for us- by siding with the legitimate desires of the customers who made Apple what it is today.
And who will make it what it will be tomorrow.
Are you shitting me? People have made careers out of crapping on Microsoft for making people spend 10 minutes downloading and installing a third party browser. Where is the outrage here?
For $800 or so, I will buy one the day they are available. To the extent I can replace both my tablet, my over-priced 1984-stealing Kindle and 

Much to my surprise, my quoted price was not $200, as widely advertised, but $500. I called customer service and was told that my contract was too recent to permit an upgrade and that I would, in fact, have to pay $500 if I wanted a Storm. I didn’t like this, but contracts are contracts, so I asked how much it would cost to terminate my contract early (by about a year and a half). $125 was the answer. So, I asked, “you’ll sell this phone to a stranger for $200, but an existing customer has to pay $500?” I was told that was the case. Again, not good news, but I understand the math so far. I had one more question: “But if I wanted to, I could pay $125 to terminate my contract today, come back tomorrow and pay $200, thereby achieving an actual price of $325?” I could tell the phone rep was uncomfortable, but ultimately she agreed that I could do that. “But you won’t sell me the phone for $325 without having to go through all of that?” She said she couldn’t. The cost was understandable, even if a little frustrating, but the unnecessary hoops were more than I could handle. So a wonderful thing happened.