We made it to Bandera, and my Verizon wireless is working. Barely, but it’s working.
We’re off to a barbecue. More later, maybe.
We made it to Bandera, and my Verizon wireless is working. Barely, but it’s working.
We’re off to a barbecue. More later, maybe.
We’re about to leave for Bandera, Texas, where we’ll be horseback riding, fishing and having fun for the next few days.
Assuming any kind of internet access is available, I’ll be posting some late at night, after the kids hit the hay.
If I catch any fish worth bragging about I guarantee you I’ll figure out a way to post a photo or two.
This is the another installment in my series of favorite records.
One of my favorite country rock bands of the early 70’s was Goose Creek Symphony. Although named for a place in Kentucky, the band was actually formed in Phoenix and played a San Francisco-influenced country rock sound.
Any of their first three records could have made my list, but I’m going to pick their first one.
Among the many great songs on Established 1970 are Charlie’s Tune, the first Goose Creek song I ever heard and still one of my favorites, a fantastic version of Satisfied Mind, Confusion, the excellent and Band-like Raid on Bush Creek and Talk About Goose Creek.
All of these songs are fantastic. Their next two records, Words of Earnest and Welcome to Goose Creek, are also excellent.
In the trivia department, the fiddle player’s wife was the maid of honor at my sister’s wedding in College Grove, Tennessee in 1976. Small world.
Goose Creek and The Amazing Rhythm Aces, along with Area Code 615 and its offspring, Barefoot Jerry, were among my favorite bands of the early 70’s- and they still are today.
Technorati Tags:
top 50 albums, record reviews
I have finshed my review of Scoble‘s feeds. The rules and criteria are here.
Here are all the winners:
A blog doesn’t need a clever name (RSS feed)
Ask Dave Taylor! (RSS feed)
Bernie DeKoven’s FunLog (RSS Feed)
Conversations with Dina (RSS Feed)
Dare Obasanjo (RSS Feed)
Down the Avenue (RSS Feed)
eHomeUpgrade (RSS Feed)
Feld Thoughts (RSS Feed)
Greg Hughes – dot – net (RSS Feed)
HorsePigCow (RSS Feed)
iBLOGthere4iM (RSS Feed)
J-Walk Blog (RSS Feed)
Jake Ludington’s MediaBlab (RSS Feed)
Knowing.Net (RSS Feed)
Leave It Behind > Brian Bailey (RSS Feed)
The Long Tail (RSS Feed)
Maryamie (RSS Feed)
Manufactured Environments (RSS Feed)
Marc’s Voice (RSS Feed)
Neopoleon.com (RSS Feed)
Neowin.net (RSS Feed)
New Media Musings (RSS Feed)
Overdo’s Land of Nothingness (RSS Feed)
Portals and KM (RSS Feed)
ProgrammableWeb (RSS Feed)
Ratcliffe Blog (RSS Feed)
Raw (RSS Feed)
Rexblog (RSS Feed)
Simon Speight (RSS Feed)
Seth Godin’s Blog (RSS Feed)
Things that Make You Go Hmmm (RSS Feed)
This is Jordon Cooper’s Weblog (RSS Feed)
Unmediated (RSS Feed)
We-Make-Money-Not-Art (RSS Feed)
Web Pages that Suck (RSS Feed)
And here are the honorable mentions (recall that any blog I already read was ineligible to win, but received an honorable mention, along with a few others):
A VC (RSS Feed)
A Welsh View (RSS Feed)
Addicted to Digital Media
Blog Maverick (RSS Feed)
BoingBoing (RSS Feed)
A View from the Isle (RSS Feed)
Cyberspace People Watcher (RSS Feed)
Chris Brooks (RSS Feed)
Doc Searls (RSS Feed)
Dan Gillmor’s eJournal (RSS Feed)
Ed Bott (RSS Feed)
Engadget (RSS Feed)
Ernie the Attorney (RSS Feed)
Evil Genius Chronicles (RSS Feed)
Flickr Blog (RSS Feed)
FuzzyBlog (RSS Feed)
Gizmodo (RSS Feed)
Global Voices (RSS Feed)
Incremental Blogger (RSS Feed)
Inside Microsoft (RSS Feed)
Ian Dixon (RSS Feed)
JKOnTheRun (RSS Feed)
Jason Calacanis Weblog (RSS Feed)
Kottke.Org (RSS Feed)
Kevin Schofield’s Weblog (RSS Feed)
Kiruba Shankar (RSS Feed)
Longhorn Blogs (RSS Feed)
Memeorandum (RSS Feed)
Micro Persuasion (RSS Feed)
Naill Kennedy’s Weblog (RSS Feed)
Om Malik on Broadband (RSS Feed)
Performancing (RSS Feed)
PVR Blog (RSS Feed)
Paul’s Down-Home Page (RSS Feed)
Podcasting News (RSS Feed)
Scobleizer (RSS Feed)
Sifry’s Alerts (RSS Feed)
Solution Watch (RSS Feed)
Scripting News (RSS Feed)
Techcrunch (RSS Feed)
Tech.Memeorandum (RSS Feed)
Techdirt (RSS Feed)
Thomas Hawk (RSS Feed)
Unofficial Apple Weblog (RSS Feed)
Unaffiliated sites number in the hundreds…
– Batman (Justice League)
As promised, Darren Rowse has posted the second part of his blog network series today, this time covering the reasons why a blogger might not want to join a blog network. I addressed his reasons why yesterday, in the context of some overtures I received from a couple of blog networks.
Let’s take a look at his reasons why not.
1) Revenue Split
I discussed this yesterday. Revenue complications are a major negative to the decision.
2) Ownership/Rights
I didn’t even think about this, but I should have. I publish a lot in the real world and, except for the one-off newspaper article, I always reserve the rights to my work and grant the publication a license to use it. I wouldn’t consider a blog network unless I retained all of the rights to my work here.
If I post a guest article on another blog, that’s one thing, but content here is off-limits as far as network ownership goes.
Definitely negative to the decision.
3) Reputation
Much like a real world association, a network member would be affected by the actions, good and bad, of other network members. Since it is unlikely that you would know all of the other network members well, this is an issue with respect to blog networks.
Of course a lot of risks could be addressed via a network-wide acceptable content policy, that could not be changed without the consent of all or a large percentage of the members.
I could write around this problem (via the aforementioned policy), so it’s only mildly negative to the decision.
4) Loss of Control
I talked about this yesterday as well. I need less administration in my life, not more. Negative to the decision.
5) Risk
This gets down to how hard or easy it would be to get out of the deal if things changed that made me uncomfortable with the direction of the network. As a musician, I often tell my musician friends that the only thing I found harder than getting signed to my first publishing deal was getting out of that same deal.
I could write around this too (via escape clauses should certain things happen), but it’s still negative to the decision.
6) Legalities and Responsibilities
This would not be a problem for me, given my day job, but I strongly suggest that anyone who is thinking about signing a network affiliation agreement have it reviewed by a lawyer. I have signed many network affiliation agreements with regard to my websites and if blog network agreements are similar (and I bet they are), they are one-sided and need to be negotiated to be fair to the blogger.
Darren says that, the issues notwithstanding, he is happy to be part of a network and believes it has helped him grow his blog, both traffic and profit-wise.
Blog networks may the just what the doctor ordered for some blogs. And I’m not ruling them out as far as my blog goes. Not now, but maybe later.
But proceed with caution, because blog networks and the agreements used to create and administer the same can have a tremendous effect on your blog and your blogging.
The secret is to maximize the positive effect while reducing the potential negative effect.
This is part twenty-four through twenty-six of my A-Z review of Scoble‘s feeds. The rules and criteria are here.
There are very few X’s, Y’s and Z’s and I didn’t find any that knocked my socks off. So after four months and 78 winners and honorable mentions, we’re done.
I have really enjoyed writing this series, and I’ve found a lot of good blogs to read. Stay tuned for a comprehensive list of all the winners and honorable mentions.
In a week or two, I’ll start my next blog discovery project. Stay tuned!
Phase I: the 80’s
My wife missed my first computer phase, back in the mid-eighties, when I had an IBM clone (that’s the exact computer I had), wrote shareware computer games and pulled many all-nighters playing Starflight. When we got married in 1993, I didn’t even have a computer at home. I started fooling around with her 386 and got the bug again.
Phase II: the 90’s
When I first started developing web sites back in the mid-nineties, my wife thought I had lost my mind. She thought the early version of Newsome.Org was mildly interesting because it had a lot of family photos and related content, but she thought all the sports and gadget related sites I was doing were just a way for me to spend more geek time on the computer. I can’t count on all my hands and feet the times we’d be at dinner with friends and someone would say “did you know Kent has a web page?” People would chuckle and I’d feel the compelled to change the subject by talking about some duck I killed or some dove I shot. Birds sacrificial to my manliness.
Then my web sites started making a little money. I took every opportunity to remind her and our friends that “Kent’s little web page” actually made $50 last month. That was a meal out, with change. So over time she sort of accepted that there was an element of business to my internet endeavors.
Then Bubble 1.0 started, and that $50 turned into $500 and then $5,000 and then $10,000. All of the sudden those little web pages were, in the eyes of some, a business. People came out of the woodwork wanting to buy them. I sold some, almost sold the crown jewel (Bubble 1.0 burst before I got the lion’s share of the purchase price) and generally felt vindicated as far as my web development activities went.
I kept a low profile after Bubble 1.0 burst, licking my wounds and trying not to look at my bombed out stock portfolio.
Phase III: the 00’s
Then came the blogging revolution. At first, I was merely an observer. Then I moved Newsome.Org to a blogging platform because it made it easier to manage content. Shortly thereafter, I jumped in and began to participate. It’s a long, uphill climb, but over time I have made progress in building Newsome.Org.
Like everyone else, when my wife found out I had turned Newsome.Org into a blog, she thought I was keeping an online diary. More dinner conversation and chuckles soon followed.
Over time, however, she began to realize what a blog in general and this blog in particular encompasses. When I began to participate in the conversations between some of the more well known bloggers, she was a little impressed.
And she was very excited when she heard Steve Rubel speak favorably about Newsome.Org in a podcast. Thanks again, Steve. That one statement validated everything I’m trying to do here, at least in my wife’s very important eyes. You need friends in the blogosphere, just like you do in the real world.
So I keep doing my thing while my wife watches out of the corner of her eye.
I have showed her some of the web sites I find so compelling. Wikipedia, Flickr, Tailrank, Megite, and my New York Times, Memeorandum. When I first started showing up on Memeorandum, I called her into my study to show her. I explained to her the way it gathers and displays tech-related topics from all over. She gave me the requisite encouragement and went about her business. Because she, like most of the people I know, just doesn’t care about tech. If it makes her life easier, she’ll use it, but that’s about as far as it goes.
This is Not Your Father’s Memeorandum
But now Gabe has done something brilliant.
We knew he was going to do another Memeorandum at some point. He mentioned food on a podcast one time, I was hoping for music and/or movies, others had their wishlist. But he did something much smarter.
He did WeSmirch, a Memeorandum for celebrity gossip. A self perpetuating People Magazine. Something that will capture an entirely different market.
This is brilliant for two reasons.
First, he didn’t cannibalize his current tech and politics user base. Sure, there will be lots of people who’ll read more than one of his memetrackers, but not as many as there would have been had he done something closer to tech, gadgets, etc.
Second, he will attract a ton of new users, like my wife, who are bored with politics and don’t care about tech. In this Web 2.0 world, eyeballs are the currency, and Gabe has a knack for making eyeballs.
My wife could care less if Amazon enters the online storage business. But she’ll be interested in some of the stuff that will show up on WeSmirch.
I can’t wait to tell her about it.
It seems Fox Interactive has acquired Newroo, a Web 2.0 application for “less than $10 million.” That’s million, not thousand. I’d tell you more about Newroo, except, well, the thing is it hasn’t even launched yet.
While $0 is technically “less than $10 million,” unless someone is being intentionally deceptive, you have to assume the number is reasonably close to $10 million. At a minimum, in the several million dollar range.
Mike Arrington says it’s a “small acquisition” for Fox.
One Commenter describes Newroo as “Memeorandum for the masses,” which is similar to the way Mike described it earlier. So users can pull content from a lot of other sites into a custom content aggregation page. That’s pretty neat, but a lot of other sites do this right now- My Yahoo, Google and Tailrank to name a few.
Maybe Newroo does it better, but $10 million dollars better?
The revenue model is, of course, ad-based, with the presentation of Amazon affiliate links for items related to the news that displays on the user’s page. The plan is to “eventually” share this revenue with the users who create the pages.
When big companies start buying unreleased technology with no meaningful revenue sources for multiple millions of dollars and referring to it as a small purchase, you can be sure the bubble is rising.
As long as these mega-companies are spending their own money, no worries. Condition red will occur when we start hearing words like IPO and spin-off.
Stay tuned.
Stowe Boyd nails the whole noisy blogosphere thing. He says it perfectly. There’s nothing I can add so let me quote reverently one passage:
It has become the conventional wisdom to reel off those sorts of pronouncements in conference halls and hallways, and lament the loss of… what, exactly? A halcyon era when the front page of the regional paper and the news anchors on the three major channels fed us their take on the news? A simpler, more bucolic blogosphere a few years back when only a few hundred people were posting?
And his conclusion is even better.
Stowe’s post has my vote for post of the year so far. Go read it.
I have a lot of thoughts about Scoble’s overwhelmed post. Yet I buy a little of what Seth Godin said yesterday about restraint, selectivity, cogency and brevity. I know brevity is not my strongest quality, so I need to engineer at least some into Newsome.Org.
So I’m going to start a new thing. 30 Seconds On. My quick take on something I read somewhere that moves me to respond.
30 Seconds on: Scoble’s Overwhelmed Post.
1) I agree that marketing done wrong (shotgunned emails in search of a shortcut that doesn’t exist) is clogging the blogosphere. Spam clogs the internet. Just ignore them both.
2) Part of Dave’s post is yet another blogotantrum because he can’t control whatever it is he wants to control. In other words, while he may have some valid points, to an extent he made his own bed.
3) No one made you the gatekeeper, Robert; you became one via your hard work, position, timing, etc. Would you really like it better if you were blogging away in obscurity? Let me answer for you- no. We wouldn’t like it either because we want you to converse with us, not just read.
4) I wish I’d heard that Jimmy Wales speech. Reading about it makes me dig Wikipedia even more.