Web 2.0 Wars: Round 7

It’s time for Round 7 in Newsome.Org’s Web 2.0 Wars. The contestants and rules are here.

This is the final heat of the first Round. The playoffs will be next.

Other Rounds:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20

Here are the contestants for Round 7:

Jotspot
Frappr
Jeteye
Dabble db
Yedda
Writeboard
Shoutwire
iKarma
Kanoodle
Airset

Jotspot is a wiki host and creation service. It allows the creation of personal or corporate wikis that can be used as a de facto intranet. Prices range from $10 a month to $200 a month.

Frappr is an online tool that lets you map out the city where you live, work, vacation, or anything else! You can then share your Frappr page with friends. You can also share photos, private message them, or leave comments on their MyFrappr homepage.

Jeteye lets you save links, images and notes in what it calls a jetpak. Jetpacks hold and help organize your important links and data. Nice idea, but a crowded field.

Dabble db is another information manager. It’s not yet live.

Yedda is an expert driven knowledge base, similar to Yahoo Answers. It’s not live yet either.

Writeboard is an online application that allows you to build sharable text documents, similar to Writely.

Shoutwire is a community news tracker, similar to Digg. It doesn’t appear to be terribly current or deep in content. Nice design.

iKarma is a feedback and self described reputation and feedback system. Think of it as eBay feedback for the whole internet. I had a bit of a hard time finding any feedback content. Neat idea, but it needs more people to input more feedback.

Kanoodle is the “leader in targeted sponsored links.” It says it is affiliated with thousands of search engines (I didn’t know there were that many of them). It places pay-per-click ads in the search result pages for you.

Airset is yet another online calendar. The application looks nice, but there are way too many applications in this space.

Before Today I’d Heard of:

0 out of 10

And the Winner of Round 7 is:

iKarma, based solely on potential. Not a strong heat.

Technorati Tags:
,

Four Things Meme

James Kendrick tagged me today in the Four Things Meme.

This is similar to one I got via email last month from a non-blogging friend of mine, but this is the first time (to my knowledge) I’ve been tagged via blog. Thanks JK!

Maybe I’m just new to the meme tagging business, but what a great way to find out a little about each other.

Four jobs I’ve had:

1) Bag Boy
2) Lifeguard
3) Heat Set Machine Operator
4) Lawyer

Four movies I can watch over and over:

1) Spaceballs
2) The Holy Grail
3) Raising Arizona
4) Up in Smoke

Four TV shows I love to watch:

1) Battlestar Galactica
2) The Amazing Race
3) Survivor
4) Lost

Four places I’ve been on vacation:

1) Bahamas
2) Cozumel
3) Santa Fe
4) Kamloops

Four favorite dishes:

1) Sushi
2) Poblano Chicken
3) Christina Fenrich’s gumbo
4) Arnie Fenrich’s garlic mashed potatoes

Four websites I visit daily:

1) Flickr
2) My Yahoo
3) Bloglines
4) Tech Memeorandum

Four bloggers I’m tagging:

1) Zoli Erdos
2) Doc Searls
3) Dave Wallace
4) Russell Limprecht

What Makes a Business Real?

karnak-793130In a post mostly designed to claim Karnak the Magnificent status, with a brief time out to praise another blogger who used to work for him for quoting him, Jason Calacanis explains to us why YouTube is “not a real business.” The circle is about to collapse on itself and we’re still in the first paragraph.

Anyway, for those like me who were bored with the story and didn’t really follow it, NBC made YouTube take down uploaded videos of the “Lazy Sunday” Saturday Night Live skit that got so much run recently- mostly because it was so available on the net. Many think, and I agree, that NBC shot itself in the foot by squelching the kind of buzz a dying of old show like the once hilarious SNL needs. This is exactly the kind of knee-jerk reaction you’d expect from old media, but some people found it compelling and there was much blogging about it.

Jason goes gives us all the reasons why YouTube is not a real business, primarily because it allows people to upload video that might be pirated. First, he compares YouTube to Kazaa and that file-sharing ilk. Then he takes a quick 180 and says that YouTube shouldn’t be shut down because it’s just like the phone company: it provides the dial tone (upload space) but what the customer does with it is up to the customer.

Does this mean that the phone company is not a real business either? Actually, it’s probably not, at least in its traditional form, but that’s not what Jason’s talking about.

Does this also mean that Flickr is not a real business? Good thing nobody told Yahoo that. How about all the file storage sites that people actually pay for (a novel concept in Web 2.0)? Does a pirated MP3 make those non-businesses as well?

I could almost get there on the argument that YouTube is not a real business, since I have said many times here that relying solely on ad revenue is not a good medium or long term business plan, mainly because you have too many players fighting over too few ad dollars in a very cyclical and fickle online ad market.

But then we get to the good part.

Jason tells us the good businesses.

Digg, Engadget and MySpace.

Engadget, of course, being one of the blogs in the blog network Jason sold to AOL, for allegedly big dollars. He still works for AOL, presumably over the blog network he created.

I wonder if he sees even a hit of irony here?

The others, while hugely popular and wildly successful by Web 2.0 standards, also rely almost entirely on ad revenue dollars.

Being at the front of the line when the limited ad dollars are passed out is a huge advantage. But it doesn’t make you IBM and, in my opinion, it doesn’t create the dangerous bubble valuations we keep getting hints of.

So these may or may not be real businesses, but just like “strange women lyin’ in ponds distributin’ swords is no basis for a system of government,” the possibility of a pirated file is no basis for deciding that something isn’t a real business.

Pandora and Last.fm Move Over

Here comes Vault Radio.

If someone decided to create a radio station that would capture and keep my attention to the exclusion of most other musical endeavors, they could not do a better job that this.

Here’s the skinny from the Vault Radio page:

Bill Graham and his concert promotion company, Bill Graham Presents, produced more than 35,000 concerts all over the world. His first venue, the legendary Fillmore Auditorium, was home to many of rock’s greatest performers – Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin, The Doors, The Grateful Dead, Jefferson Airplane, Otis Redding, Marvin Gaye, Led Zeppelin, Eric Clapton, Bob Dylan, Prince – and the list goes on and on.

Graham taped thousands of live performances and stored the tapes in the basement of the BGP headquarters.

These tapes and the concerts they captured lay dormant until the Bill Graham archive was acquired by Wolfgang’s Vault (Bill Graham’s given first name was Wolfgang) in 2003.

Vault Radio is now playing selected tracks from these concerts in an FM-quality, 128K digital radio stream. Songs will be added to and removed from the radio show on a regular basis. We will be broadcasting unaltered live performance music from many of the greatest bands of the last 40 years. The music you hear on Vault Radio has not been sweetened or polished. You’ll be listening to what the band played that night – nothing more, nothing less.

Cheers!

Cheers indeed.

Bubble 2.0: Six Apart Gets Nutty Money?

Lots of huffing and puffing beneath the bubble as Om reports on a rumor (and he calls it such at this point), that Six Apart, the company that brought us TypePad, Moveable Type and Live Journal, has raised another $12M in financing.

The fact that the word another and million are both in that sentence is scary enough. The fact that there’s a 12 before the word million means it’s time to run to the store for water bottles, batteries and plywood. The bubble may be upon us.

Go read Om’s post for the details on what he has heard and to see any updates once he tracks down some of the players.

Om ends by wondering about the exit strategy for Six Apart. You can be sure if some supposedly smart money is investing serious money in this company they have one. And I can only think of two:

(1) get bought by one greater fool, such as Yahoo or Google or another company that has lots of money burning a hole in its pocket; or

(2) get bought by a bunch of greater fools in an IPO.

Generally speaking, there has to be an exit strategy because, sadly, few of these new tech companies really plan on selling a product for the long term- most of them are interested only in selling themselves.

I suspect there is a hush all over the VC world (to paraphrase Herman) because the first one of these one-trick ponies to actually admit it wants to go public will face token scrutiny by some old media and outcry by those stalwart few who remain committed to learning from the past.

But when one of these companies breaks from the pack and heads towards Wall Street, the rest of them will stop and watch closely. If the first one makes it without falling flat on its face, I fear the race will be on.

The Politics of Blogging

Guy Kawasaki has a post today that talks about the best ways to attract the A-Listers towards your product so they’ll write about it.

Mike Arrington and Om Malik respond by saying all that’s not necessary.

I’m going to defend Guy in a minute, but first I have to make a point.

I think it’s interesting that Guy talks in terms of the A-Listers. Does anyone think that if Guy wasn’t Guy (upper case) but was some equally smart but unknown guy (lower case) who’d been blogging for a whopping month and a half, Mike and Om would have seen his post and, even if they had seen it, bothered to read it much less respond to it? Guy, what do you think?

Om suggests simply saying:

“I got this story/idea I am pitching. Any interest?” Two lines – and absolutely no need to suck-up.

That approach works with me. I’m beta testing and preparing to write about several products right now that I wouldn’t have known about and certainly wouldn’t have access to if the developers hadn’t emailed me.

I don’t know, though, how well that approach would work with a card carrying A-Lister. I suspect it would work with Om, but I also suspect it would not work with some of the others.

Mike says two things of interest:

Some of the suggestions, like linking back to bloggers, are good ones.

Well, that’s never worked for me as far as Mike’s concerned. I’ve linked to him a ton. I’ve tried content and depth; I’ve tried humor. I can’t help but think he’s seen links to my posts via Technorati or on one of the memetrackers or even on a fellow A-Lister’s blog, but my attempt to reach out has so far fallen on deaf hands. Of course, I haven’t emailed him because I don’t want to violate the rule implied in the other interesting thing he said:

I don’t want people to be friends with me because they are planning ahead to the day when they need something from me. I want them to be friends with me because they like me.

Even though every single marketing person in the entire universe knows that one of the first things you need to do is become friends with your target audience, be it customers, readers or linkers, I agree with Mike on this point. It is a little creepy, and I don’t and won’t do it.

I have managed to become friends with a good number of other bloggers, some A-List, some not, simply by talking about the same topics and earning my way into the conversation. But a lot of people don’t respond to that, perhaps for a good reason (they don’t see your posts) and perhaps not.

But here’s the thing. If you’re Mike Arrington (who granted has earned his lofty perch in the blogosphere) or Guy Kawasaki (who got a free pass because of prior accomplishments and relationships), it’s pretty easy to make A-List friends. But all of us aren’t Mikes and Guys.

And even though he does it in a strange, roundabout way, Guy seems to realize that and offers advice for the rest of us.

Tags: , ,

Second Opinion Update

In addition to myself and Shane Ede, Doc Searls nodded approvingly at the Second Opinion concept yesterday, as did Dave Wallace (the LifeKludger).

Dave and Mike Seyfang talk about expanding the conversation in their latest podcast. I listened to it last night and the discussion is interesting and relevant.

Anyone else want to give it a go? How about some of my fellow Wagon Train members?

As an aside, are there any bad blogs in Australia?

Design, RSS and Internet Explorer

Fraser Kelton talked a little bit yesterday about blog design, the memetrackers and the effect of both (or either) on a blog’s RSS subscription count.

rsslogoI’ve been thinking about and actually charting my RSS subscription numbers for a couple of weeks now trying to pattern out where my subscribers are coming from and why they do or don’t stick around. I haven’t arrived at any conclusions yet, but here’s what I’ve figured out so far.

First, My Tragic Template Tale

Fraser was responding in part to a post by Jeff Jarvis bemoaning the limitations of blog templates. In large part I agree with Jeff, but I think that limitation is really a function of the connected structure of the internet itself. By that I mean even if you didn’t use a blogging platform and hand created your web site and all the articles/posts thereon, you’d run into the same problem. Why? Because blogs by definition have to make it easy and efficient for search engines, other blogs and desired web applications to easily mine them for data.

For example, blog platforms have to know where to put and not put new posts, old posts and other content so the Technoratis, Googles and memetrackers can identify new content, index it and extract the relevant portions. I’m sure if you were a code writing guru you could accomplish just about anything you wanted as far as your blog template goes, but if you went too far into uncharted territory, none of the search engines could find your content. Those of us who have had problems getting indexed correctly by Technorati are exhibits aplenty for this proposition.

But there are other problems related to blog templates that make me crazy. My blog template is the result of hours and hours of work, both by me and a CSS-guru friend of mine. We worked very hard to get the 3 column layout to work the way I want it to. Now it does. But as a result I am highly resistant to any major changes to my template, because of the resulting change to the look and feel of my website. So I am a slave to my template in that regard. But that’s only because I like it.

There’s an even bigger problem.

Because of my occasional partial RSS-feed problem that I can’t get anyone at Bloglines to address, much less fix (and it happens to other people as well) and because there is some evidence that the problem is caused by Blogger, who I use to publish, but not host, Newsome.Org, I have been in the process of trying to move over to WordPress. Another friend of mine is helping me do that- the biggest hurdle being the mandate to preserve the prior posts, comments and look and feel.

Well guess what? We can design a template that looks just like this one. In fact we (by we I really mean he) have already done so. The problem arises when we try to import my old content. Because of naming conventions and other problems, it is very hard to do. We’ll probably figure it out, but it’s a lot harder than it ought to be.

Porting blog content around should be easier. There need to be standards here, and as of now there are not.

Now About Those Subscribers

I have not been able to fully pattern out my subscriber situation.

But one thing I know, which supports Fraser’s Internet Explorer theory, is that I get a lot more web traffic than I do RSS traffic. Probably 10 times more, though the numbers fluctuate wildly.

By fluctuate wildly, I mean my subscriber count goes up and down, sometimes by hundreds in a matter of a day or two. Maybe this is normal, but sometimes, for no apparent reason, my count goes up or down by the hundreds. The overall trend is up at a good rate, but the chart looks like a day traders’ dream.

I also know that when I get linked by one of the mega-blogs, like Steve, Scoble, Doc or Hugh, my subscription numbers spike way up and then recede like a wave. Not all the way back, but I estimate that I lose over 50% of my new subscribers within a week after the link. I don’t know if that’s just me or if this is representative of a larger trend.

My web site traffic spikes when I get a link from a mega-blog too. But it recedes even more. I often lose over 75% of my web traffic spike over the following week.

Maybe this means I can’t write or that my blog is boring, but, again, the overall trend is very positive. My numbers are growing very steadily. But it’s a pretty wild ride if you believe the charts- like riding a bucking bronc up bloggers hill.

Obviously, the answer to part of the web traffic loss is that the hurdle to an RSS subscription is higher, but retention is probably greater, since you have to elect to unsubscribe. On the other hand the hurdle for a web visit is very low (merely a click) but there is no subscription to automatically bring you back. Plus, almost all of the RSS subscribers come first via a web link and won’t need to come back that way once they subscribe to the RSS feed.

But it’s still a wild ride.

My Conclusions

Nothing particularly mind-bending, but here they are:

1) A lot more people visit my blog via a web browser than via an RSS feed.

2) Web browser visitors are less likely to return.

3) Mega-blog links provide significant traffic spikes (thanks guys, please keep them coming).

4) Well over half of the mega-blog traffic spike melts away within a week.

5) A link from a big but not mega blog that shares your target audience will result in more long-term growth than a link from a mega-blog that doesn’t.

What this tells me, of course, is that getting to the top of bloggers hill takes more than a link from a mega-blog. It takes a regular flow of links from both mega-blogs and other blogs that share a similar target audience and content that attracts that traffic back to your content.

"Oh man, I shot Harry in the face"

One of the great things about being the Vice President is that, in addition to getting to go hunting all over the place, if you accidently pull a Vincent Vega and shoot someone in the face, they apologize to you.

Maybe this will start a new trend.

Someone steals your car, write them a note apologizing for not having a nicer one.

Lose your wallet to a pickpocket, track them down and slip them an extra 20.

The neighborhood kids egg your house, take their parents a dozen eggs to replace the broken ones.

I think this might get legs

Circle the Wagons Boys

Fellow Wagon Trainer Mathew Ingram is taunting the bear again by telling Dave Winer it’s time to let go of RSS.

As I’ve said before, Mathew is a future A-Lister, whose penetration into the blogosphere and the major memetrackers is both deep and well deserved.

But if I want to travel with him to the top of bloggers hill, I’ve got to keep him from getting mauled to death by the bear.smallicon-793225

While we weren’t looking Mathew jumped off the wagon, grabbed a stick and ran wildly towards the woods looking for the bear to convince him to give up the honey.

We’ve got to watch him more closely.

Tags: , ,