Get Your Vista: Public Beta

vista

Microsoft released a “Customer Preview” of Vista today, which is available to the general public. Previously, Vista has been in private beta testing. According to C|Net, Microsoft is still planning a January release.

Casual users beware, Microsoft warns that the beta version is not yet ready for primetime:

“This is beta code and should not be used in a production environment or on a main machine in the home. Beta 2 is intended for developers, IT professionals and technology experts to continue or begin their testing of Windows Vista. Before you decide to use Beta 2, you should feel comfortable with installing operating systems, updating drivers, and general PC troubleshooting. Some risks of using beta operating systems include hardware and software incompatibility and system instability. If you have concerns about installing this beta software on your computer, we encourage you to obtain the final release version of Windows Vista when it is available in 2007.”

I will probably install the beta on one of my extra computers this weekend. If I do, I’ll post the results and my thoughts.

The Houston Chronicle Gets RSS

In more ways than one.

Demonstrating once again that someone or ones there really understand the evolving world of information distribution, the Houston Chronicle has added even more RSS Feeds. The Chronicle has been at the top of the internet curve for some time now, and it shows.

I am delighted about the new feeds, because I get more and more of my news via RSS feeds all the time. Part of this is by choice and part of it is because I’m still not crazy about their new web site design (sorry Dwight). The news is too hard to find and the text far too small for my middle aged eyes.

It could be worse, however. The worst web site redesign this side of Geocities is the one The Houston Press did a few months ago. I used to read the Press every week. I haven’t read a single article since the redesign.

CBS Reaches Out to Bloggers

I love it when old media (or their newer offspring) reaches out to new media. It tells me that some smart person has correctly concluded that bloggers are not competing with CBS News, CNN, etc.

I got a Comment to my Google post today from an intern at CBS asking me if I would consider writing about an upcoming series on CBSNews.com. It seems that starting on June 13, CBSNews.com will do a three day series of reports on the “intersection of teenagers and technology.”

CBS is encouraging people to write in with questions or concerns. The email link is in the story linked above.

This is certainly a timely topic and I look forward to reading the articles. I hope the series will be a substantive piece that talks to the right people and asks the hard questions.

Here are some topics I hope they cover:

1) The “fox guarding the henhouse” problem that naturally and inevitably arises when you ask a company like MySpace, which makes money off of traffic, to improve online security by imposing restrictions on the restriction-averse kids who make up the lion’s share of such traffic. It’s easy to hire some consultant to toss out a bunch of gimmes to the eager press, but taking the sort of hard and decisive action needed to be effective is another matter.

2) The emergence of Second Life and other similar sites as the new social network. I want to hear from the developers of these sites as well as parent and teacher groups as to what is being done to make these sites safe and what isn’t being done that ought to be. Second Life should be applauded for having its teen grid, but what I want to know is how easy is it for a kid to sneak into the adult grid and what does Second Life and others do to catch them whey they do.

3) The degree to which technology encroaches into the educational system as a disruptive influence. I can tell you from experience that a lot of the kids in the law school classes I teach are constantly surfing, chatting, etc.

4) And finally, I want them to find the person responsible for that idiotic, indefensible Tagworld ad and ask him to explain in great detail and defend the decision making process that led to that ad.

I’ll write again on this series once it starts.

An Expensive Game of Risk: Google’s Roll

As I expected, Henry Blodget has a interesting and on the money take on the new Google Spreadsheet. Along with Gmail and Writely, Google Spreadsheet makes the core of a free, online alternative to Microsoft Office. It’s a high profile and expensive game of Risk, where the game board is comprised of groups of computer users.

Henry begins with the potentially good part of Google’s play:

“First, if Google’s long-term ambition is to bring Microsoft down, this is, in fact, the way to do it. Google Spreadsheet and Google Word, as described, resemble classic disruptive technologies: cheaper, more convenient, no-frills solutions aimed at products with fat product margins whose complexity and usefulness have overshot the mainstream.”

He then expresses two very good concerns. First, he says, and I heartily agree, that power users who use Excel for their businesses (and their job security) are not going to dump Excel in favor of a stripped down, online alternative. Second, he wonders, as I did back during the Writely acquisition, what is the business plan here? A million users times free is still free.

It’s likely all about the almighty ad dollar, but Henry and I agree on that strategy as well:

“[N]o serious spreadsheet and word-processing user I know of is ever going to stop working on documents to click nearby ads (The “PPC ads in apps” concept is absurd).”

Microsoft is camped out on the side of the game board with all of the business and corporate users. It is heavily fortified and will be virtually impossible to displace. That was my strategy back in my Risk playing days: fortify a strategic area and let the other players fight it out for the less valuable real estate.

The reason this game is unwinnable for Google comes down to two things: the free part and the online part.

When something is free, people ask themselves two questions:

How do I know this free thing will always be available?

How do I know they won’t start charging me once I go to all the trouble to adopt and use it?

These are good questions.

When something is partially or fully online, people also have two questions:

How do I know my data is safe and won’t get lost, thereby causing me to lose my job?

How do I know all the hackers I read about in the paper won’t intercept my data and give or sell it to my competitors?

For these reasons, corporate America will not, in our lifetime, adopt online word processing or spreadsheet applications to any significant degree.

All of this means that Google is making a play for what Henry calls the “casual Microsoft Office user.” I would say it’s more accurately the casual Microsoft Works user. There are a lot of people who will adopt these free applications for personal use, but big business will not. Never. Ever.

So my specific question is how does Google think this is going to make, as opposed to cost, money?

And my general question is when and why did spending a fortune trying to hurt Microsoft by giving away free stuff become Google’s strategic business plan?

25 Backstroke

25 Backstroke
Delaney in the 25 meter backstroke

Cassidy and Delaney had their second swim meet tonight. They both improved most of their times. In their heat of the 25 meter freestyle, Rachael, Cassidy and Evie finished 1-2-3.

Tags:

Get Well Sawyer!

I saw this post on Scoble’s blog about Howard Greenstein‘s nephew Sawyer, who is recovering from a mysterious spinal incident that has impaired his mobility from the hips down.

I don’t know Howard, but according to Scoble he ran the Twin Towers Fund which raised millions of dollars in support of the 9/11 victims. Sounds like a guy who knows how to make a difference, so it’s an honor to do a little something to help him help Sawyer.

In an effort to raise Sawyer’s spirits, Howard has started a web site where people can send well wishes and photographs with a “Get Well Sawyer” sign.

Here from my study at beautiful Rancho DeNada in Bellaire, Texas is my contribution.

If you are a blogger and/or have a camera and you want to do something cool for a kid who needs everyone’s support, here’s your chance.

Agoraphobia in the Blogosphere

agoraphobia

Early 2006, like late 1989, was the year the wall came down. There was a lot of good conversation about gatekeeping in the blogosphere- the much debated phenomenon whereby the bloggers with the largest readership link primarily to each other and guard carefully the door to the elite blogging clubhouse. As a result of these discussions, a lot of people decided the blogosphere should be a free and open place, where new voices would be welcomed and everyone could join in the conversation.

Quite a few A-List bloggers did their part to promote and nurture the open blogosphere concept. Some even drew maps for the rest of us to use on Blogger’s Hill.

That was a good thing- for everybody. Because it is fair and just, sure. But also because the blogosphere is tiny in general (some people continually forget this)- and the tech-related blogosphere simply cannot survive and stay fresh without an inflow of new voices.

But after the walls came down, it seems a few of the old clubmembers began to feel anxious about the public and potentially crowded nature of the evolving blogosphere. A few seem to be suffering from agoraphobia. They have decided to build some new walls around themselves in an effort to recreate the blogging caste system that seems to be their safety zone. Several people (like Mathew Ingram and Scott Karp) do their best to convince these faux agoraphobics to get treatment, but their cries fall on deaf ears- because these agoraphobics (unlike real ones) don’t want to be cured. They just want their walls back.

Some, like Seth Godin and Russ Beattie (who later stopped blogging altogether), decided that interacting with the rest of us is just too much trouble. Others, most notably Steve Gillmor and those under his influence, argue that conversing with the rest of us is bad for their reputation and makes them seem less of an authority. I’m sure glad my college and graduate school professors didn’t think that.

Here’s the thing (again). There are no rules that require anyone’s personal web page (be it a blog or a walled in soapbox) to look a certain way or to link here, there or anywhere. Not wanting to talk to the rest of us is OK. Turning your blog into a personal newspaper or magazine equivalent of a one-man band is fine. Really.

The problem is that some of these faux agoraphobics want us to believe that they are making all of these decisions based on logic and reflection and with an eye toward the greater good, when the fact is they are being made primarily as a result of unchecked human nature and for personal gain. Cattle ranchers, miners, merchants and bloggers all benefit from being there first. The early arrivals get the best land and a head start on mining for gold and readers. When the gold rush starts and the rest of us head west, we are encroaching on their land and their fortunes. What began as a head start for them has transformed into a God-given right that demands protection. So ranchers, miners, merchants and bloggers try to circle the wagons against the newcomers. This isn’t some story I’m making up- this is history. Grab a book and check it out, or turn on the Westerns channel on DirecTV.

Add to that concept the other human need- to belong and exclude, and you can understand why the open and crowded blogosphere (or the possibility of it) is a ripe breeding ground for faux agoraphobia.

The absurd lengths some people go to in a silly and transparent effort to separate themselves from the rest of the blogosphere makes me wonder what these folks would do if there was actually any money to be made blogging. I suspect these turned up noses and fence building exercises would erupt into a full fledged range war.

Faux agoraphobia is spreading in parts of the blogosphere. There are lots of proffered explanations as to why. But there’s only one reason.

Human nature. They just won’t admit it.

The Swift Way to Blog Stardom

Seth Godin has a wonderfully satirical post today that provides 56 tips to increase your blog traffic.

Among my favorites:

11. Don’t write about your cat, your boyfriend or your kids.
13. Write about your kids.

10. Encourage your readers to help you manipulate the technorati.

19. Do email interviews with the well-known.

21. Use photos. Salacious ones are best.

31. Write about stuff that appeals to the majority of current blog readers–like gadgets and web 2.0.

37. Keep tweaking your template to make it include every conceivable bell or whistle.

15. Be sycophantic. Share linklove and expect some back.
44. Don’t interrupt your writing with a lot of links.

This is good stuff.

The point is that there is no recipe you can follow to ensure a popular blog. All you can do is write hard, try to write well, join in the conversations and wait.

I am a songwriter, and have been for many years. There is a camp within the songwriting community who believe that writing a song is like baking a cake. You put the right ingredients in, mix it up and bake it for the specified length of time and, presto, you’ll have a good song.

Of course when you listen to excellent songs by Bruce Springsteen or Van Morrison or Bob Dylan, you quickly notice that many of their songs ignore many of the so called rules. I’ve had people who claim to be songwriters tell me all the reasons why some of my songs that have been recorded by more that one artist will never get cut. Normally, I just let them go on, without telling them about the cuts, because the purpose of that conversation is for them to talk, not for me to hear. I know that, more times than not, their strict adherence to the songwriting recipe will keep them from the experimentation that can lead to great art.

Recipes are fine for science. Blogs and songs are not science. They are art. And while there are some basic principles you can follow to make better art, good art is what people who see it like.

It’s the same way with blogs.

Synergy Spinergy

Henry Blodgett reports that there is an article in the Walled Street Times (which I can’t read because I’m not going to pay for it) about Time Warner and it’s out of favor stepchild, AOL. It seems that Time Warner has decided that all of that synergy that was going to be realized upon the marriage of Time Warner and AOL isn’t going to come to pass after all.

In fact, Time Warner’s president calls the synergy concept “bullshit.” That’s pretty much how I feel whenever I hear one of those fancy words that mean let’s do this even though there’s no demonstrable benefit to be gained.

Henry sums up this ill-fated deal beautifully:

“Perhaps synergy is, in fact, bullshit–perhaps the merger was doomed from the moment it popped into Steve Case and Jerry Levin’s bubble-addled heads.”

AOL is like the oldies concert circuit- there’s my former hero up there on stage, but man he looks old and I can’t believe he’s come to this.