ScobleFeeds A-Z: The X’s, Y’s and Z’s

This is part twenty-four through twenty-six of my A-Z review of Scoble‘s feeds. The rules and criteria are here.

There are very few X’s, Y’s and Z’s and I didn’t find any that knocked my socks off. So after four months and 78 winners and honorable mentions, we’re done.

I have really enjoyed writing this series, and I’ve found a lot of good blogs to read. Stay tuned for a comprehensive list of all the winners and honorable mentions.

In a week or two, I’ll start my next blog discovery project. Stay tuned!

My Internet Journey & a Memeorandum Even My Wife Will Love

Phase I: the 80′s

My wife missed my first computer phase, back in the mid-eighties, when I had an IBM clone (that’s the exact computer I had), wrote shareware computer games and pulled many all-nighters playing Starflight. When we got married in 1993, I didn’t even have a computer at home. I started fooling around with her 386 and got the bug again.

Phase II: the 90′s

When I first started developing web sites back in the mid-nineties, my wife thought I had lost my mind. She thought the early version of Newsome.Org was mildly interesting because it had a lot of family photos and related content, but she thought all the sports and gadget related sites I was doing were just a way for me to spend more geek time on the computer. I can’t count on all my hands and feet the times we’d be at dinner with friends and someone would say “did you know Kent has a web page?” People would chuckle and I’d feel the compelled to change the subject by talking about some duck I killed or some dove I shot. Birds sacrificial to my manliness.

Then my web sites started making a little money. I took every opportunity to remind her and our friends that “Kent’s little web page” actually made $50 last month. That was a meal out, with change. So over time she sort of accepted that there was an element of business to my internet endeavors.

Then Bubble 1.0 started, and that $50 turned into $500 and then $5,000 and then $10,000. All of the sudden those little web pages were, in the eyes of some, a business. People came out of the woodwork wanting to buy them. I sold some, almost sold the crown jewel (Bubble 1.0 burst before I got the lion’s share of the purchase price) and generally felt vindicated as far as my web development activities went.

I kept a low profile after Bubble 1.0 burst, licking my wounds and trying not to look at my bombed out stock portfolio.

Phase III: the 00′s

Then came the blogging revolution. At first, I was merely an observer. Then I moved Newsome.Org to a blogging platform because it made it easier to manage content. Shortly thereafter, I jumped in and began to participate. It’s a long, uphill climb, but over time I have made progress in building Newsome.Org.

Like everyone else, when my wife found out I had turned Newsome.Org into a blog, she thought I was keeping an online diary. More dinner conversation and chuckles soon followed.

Over time, however, she began to realize what a blog in general and this blog in particular encompasses. When I began to participate in the conversations between some of the more well known bloggers, she was a little impressed.

And she was very excited when she heard Steve Rubel speak favorably about Newsome.Org in a podcast. Thanks again, Steve. That one statement validated everything I’m trying to do here, at least in my wife’s very important eyes. You need friends in the blogosphere, just like you do in the real world.

So I keep doing my thing while my wife watches out of the corner of her eye.

I have showed her some of the web sites I find so compelling. Wikipedia, Flickr, Tailrank, Megite, and my New York Times, Memeorandum. When I first started showing up on Memeorandum, I called her into my study to show her. I explained to her the way it gathers and displays tech-related topics from all over. She gave me the requisite encouragement and went about her business. Because she, like most of the people I know, just doesn’t care about tech. If it makes her life easier, she’ll use it, but that’s about as far as it goes.

This is Not Your Father’s Memeorandum

But now Gabe has done something brilliant.

We knew he was going to do another Memeorandum at some point. He mentioned food on a podcast one time, I was hoping for music and/or movies, others had their wishlist. But he did something much smarter.

He did WeSmirch, a Memeorandum for celebrity gossip. A self perpetuating People Magazine. Something that will capture an entirely different market.

This is brilliant for two reasons.

First, he didn’t cannibalize his current tech and politics user base. Sure, there will be lots of people who’ll read more than one of his memetrackers, but not as many as there would have been had he done something closer to tech, gadgets, etc.

Second, he will attract a ton of new users, like my wife, who are bored with politics and don’t care about tech. In this Web 2.0 world, eyeballs are the currency, and Gabe has a knack for making eyeballs.

My wife could care less if Amazon enters the online storage business. But she’ll be interested in some of the stuff that will show up on WeSmirch.

I can’t wait to tell her about it.

Bubble 2.0 Watch: Big Bucks for Newroo

It seems Fox Interactive has acquired Newroo, a Web 2.0 application for “less than $10 million.” That’s million, not thousand. I’d tell you more about Newroo, except, well, the thing is it hasn’t even launched yet.

While $0 is technically “less than $10 million,” unless someone is being intentionally deceptive, you have to assume the number is reasonably close to $10 million. At a minimum, in the several million dollar range.

Mike Arrington says it’s a “small acquisition” for Fox.

One Commenter describes Newroo as “Memeorandum for the masses,” which is similar to the way Mike described it earlier. So users can pull content from a lot of other sites into a custom content aggregation page. That’s pretty neat, but a lot of other sites do this right now- My Yahoo, Google and Tailrank to name a few.

Maybe Newroo does it better, but $10 million dollars better?

The revenue model is, of course, ad-based, with the presentation of Amazon affiliate links for items related to the news that displays on the user’s page. The plan is to “eventually” share this revenue with the users who create the pages.

When big companies start buying unreleased technology with no meaningful revenue sources for multiple millions of dollars and referring to it as a small purchase, you can be sure the bubble is rising.

As long as these mega-companies are spending their own money, no worries. Condition red will occur when we start hearing words like IPO and spin-off.

Stay tuned.

Tags:

Amen, Brother!

Stowe Boyd nails the whole noisy blogosphere thing. He says it perfectly. There’s nothing I can add so let me quote reverently one passage:

It has become the conventional wisdom to reel off those sorts of pronouncements in conference halls and hallways, and lament the loss of… what, exactly? A halcyon era when the front page of the regional paper and the news anchors on the three major channels fed us their take on the news? A simpler, more bucolic blogosphere a few years back when only a few hundred people were posting?

And his conclusion is even better.

Stowe’s post has my vote for post of the year so far. Go read it.

30 Seconds on: Scoble's Overwhelmed Post.

I have a lot of thoughts about Scoble’s overwhelmed post. Yet I buy a little of what Seth Godin said yesterday about restraint, selectivity, cogency and brevity. I know brevity is not my strongest quality, so I need to engineer at least some into Newsome.Org.

So I’m going to start a new thing. 30 Seconds On. My quick take on something I read somewhere that moves me to respond.

30 Seconds on: Scoble’s Overwhelmed Post.

1) I agree that marketing done wrong (shotgunned emails in search of a shortcut that doesn’t exist) is clogging the blogosphere. Spam clogs the internet. Just ignore them both.

2) Part of Dave’s post is yet another blogotantrum because he can’t control whatever it is he wants to control. In other words, while he may have some valid points, to an extent he made his own bed.

3) No one made you the gatekeeper, Robert; you became one via your hard work, position, timing, etc. Would you really like it better if you were blogging away in obscurity? Let me answer for you- no. We wouldn’t like it either because we want you to converse with us, not just read.

4) I wish I’d heard that Jimmy Wales speech. Reading about it makes me dig Wikipedia even more.

The Independent Blog and the Network Question

Well, ain’t it a small world, spiritually speaking.
Pete and Delmar just been baptized and saved.
I guess I’m the only one that remains unaffiliated.

- Ulysses Everett McGill

Darren Rowse has a post today explaining why a blogger should consider joining a blog network.

I have written before on blog networks, and have actually had a couple of inquiries from networks wondering if I was interested in joining one. Because I was flattered by the interest, I thought about it some.

I asked myself what a blog network could do for Newsome.Org and, more importantly, what Newsome.Org could do for it. Until you join a group, human nature dictates that the issue is all about getting in. Insiders know that once you’re in, many other issues arise around staying in and keeping everyone happy.

It’s not an easy decision.

Let’s take a look at Darren’s reasons in favor of networks and see how they might apply to a reasonably popular independent blog.

1) Relationships

This is the great double-edged sword of the network question. Certainly, you would build and cement relationships with those in your network, but you might also chill your relationships with those in other or no networks.

I ultimately concluded that this was a wash. Partly positive and partly negative to the decision.

2) Traffic

This is the primary reason I considered pursuing a network affiliation. We have talked it to death, but for most bloggers, traffic is one of the goals. Traffic equals readers equals comments equals conversations, etc.

Definitely positive to the decision.

3) Expertise

Darren says, correctly, that a network relationship can give you the benefit of the other members’ expertise in blog building, etc. I didn’t think about it in exactly that way- for me it was more about finding some cool, smart people to travel through the blogosphere with. Sort of an extension of my wagon train concept.

Mildly positive to the decision.

4) Administration

I definitely thought about this, and it was negative to the decision. I have too much administration in my life already and I’m reasonably tech-proficient. The last thing I want is to have to remake my page in the image of some network look and feel. Granted, I’m sure some networks are more flexible than others in this regard, but it is something I want to mostly avoid.

5) Revenue

This is the biggest issue in the network question. I am not blogging to make money. I may one day have some text ads to help pay the server costs, etc. and if anyone wants to throw some money at me, I’ll probably take it. But it is absolutely not the reason I write. Plus, of course, the network takes a cut of that revenue, which raises all sorts of other complicated issues. If I ever join a network, it probably won’t be because of the revenue factor. In fact, it would likely be in spite of it.

Revenue complications are a big negative to the decision.

6) Search Engine Optimization

If you get permanent links from other network blogs, you may move up the search result pages. I find SEO for SEO sake a little creepy. Traffic is good and I want it, but I’d rather let it come naturally. SEO is not something I thought about, and it would not be a factor should I ever join a network.

Neither positive nor negative to the decision.

7) Prestige

I thought about this more than I would have expected to. I am, in theory, completely unconcerned with prestige, yet there it was- leading me to think long and hard about a possible network affiliation.

I’m not proud about it, but the prestige factor was a mildly positive to the decision.

8) Learning

Darren mentions that you can learn a lot, about writing and blogging, by being part of a network. I suspect you can, but you can probably learn just as much from reading all sorts of blogs, both network and non-network.

Neither positive nor negative to the decision.

At the end of the day, I didn’t pursue any network opportunities. That’s not to say I never will, but for the time being it doesn’t seem to make sense to join a network.

Darren promises a future article on why not to join a blog network. I’ll take a similar look at that post when its published.

Amazon S3: Not the GDrive Killer Some are Claiming

That whacking sound heard throughout the blogosphere today is the sound of Amazon whacking Google and the rest of the online storage players about the head. Amazon has released a very inexpensive online storage service that some are saying will change the online storage game.

First, the good. The service is very inexpensive. $0.15 per GB-Month of storage used and $.20 per GB-month of data transferred.

So lets say someone wants to host all their data with Amazon and serve it to their web page. Maybe 20 GB of data and 30 GB of bandwidth (transfer). That’s $3.00 per month for the storage plus $6.00 for the bandwidth, for a total of $9.00 a month. That’s an almost unbelievable price.

I signed up early this morning, and will play around with the service this weekend and report my impressions.

But this is not the GDrive and Box.Net killer some are saying it is.

Because this service is in no way, shape or form designed for the consumer to back up his or her data or media files. It is aimed at developers.

To consumers, FTP is hard enough. Soap is for the shower and rest is what you do when you’re tired. So while developers will find Amazon’s service irresistible, consumers will still look to other consumer-oriented services that make the management of online storage easier and more intuitive.

And of course by consumers, I also mean small and medium businesses without a dedicated IT department.

So while I’m excited about Amazon’s new service, let’s not get too carried away about its effect on the consumer online storage industry.